<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for untu.ms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://untu.ms/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://untu.ms</link>
	<description>Blogs ar mnemonisku un modīgu adresi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skype lieldienu ola by LiquidEyes</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2011/03/skype-lieldienu-ola/comment-page-1/#comment-6482</link>
		<dc:creator>LiquidEyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=755#comment-6482</guid>
		<description>Hello,
I was looking for a contact email addy but couldn&#039;t find one so I am leaving you this comment. I found this lovely photo of yours of a book that I would like to use, could you please email me?
http://pyonpyon.deviantart.com/art/Old-Book-I-55891556</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I was looking for a contact email addy but couldn&#8217;t find one so I am leaving you this comment. I found this lovely photo of yours of a book that I would like to use, could you please email me?<br />
<a href="http://pyonpyon.deviantart.com/art/Old-Book-I-55891556" rel="nofollow">http://pyonpyon.deviantart.com/art/Old-Book-I-55891556</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skype lieldienu ola by Krist2ps</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2011/03/skype-lieldienu-ola/comment-page-1/#comment-6182</link>
		<dc:creator>Krist2ps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=755#comment-6182</guid>
		<description>Labs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skype lieldienu ola by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2011/03/skype-lieldienu-ola/comment-page-1/#comment-6047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=755#comment-6047</guid>
		<description>KO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inside Job by Maarcis</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2011/03/inside-job/comment-page-1/#comment-5991</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarcis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=747#comment-5991</guid>
		<description>Vai tev neliekas mazliet savādi, ka Holivuda atmasko Volstrītu? Pats skatījos šo filmu pirms trim mēnešiem un te ir viens garš, bet, manuprāt, labs komentārs (daži interesanti fakti) par to:

Talking about &quot;Inside Job&quot;...

My curiosity was piqued when a friend told me of the upcoming Wall Street documentary exposé &#039;Inside Job&#039;. It&#039;s got some pretty good reviews, and perhaps it will pack enough punch to educate the general public about the theft of taxpayer money that constituted the euphemistically termed &#039;bailout&#039;. Online reviews have praised the film, &quot;A wake-up call of macroeconomic proportions&quot;, &quot;Economics explained beautifully&quot; -- certainly sounds worth a watch.

Admittedly though, you have to be quite naive to think that a genuine expose of Wall Street could even see the light of day in Hollywood, considering the corporate nature of media ownership. After a short Internet search, things begin to fall into place.

&#039;Inside Job&#039; is directed by Charles H. Ferguson. His past works include a film called &#039;No End in Sight -- The American Occupation of Iraq&#039; -- a piece critical of the Bush administration&#039;s management of the war in Iraq. So far, so good. Sort of.

The alarming thing about Ferguson is his lifelong membership of the Council on Foreign Relations. See CFR&#039;s private membership roster (http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html?letter=F) and Ferguson&#039;s Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H.­_Ferguson).

CFR is a think tank which, in a nutshell, exists to shape the US international agenda in favour of its corporate members. CFR&#039;s corporate roster is here (http://www.cfr.org/about/corporate/rost­er.html), and it makes for some startling reading.

The founding member corporations of CFR are as follows:

Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Chevron Corporation
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Hess Corporation
McKinsey &amp; Company, Inc.
The Nasdaq OMX Group

(I&#039;ve added the emphases for obvious reasons).

How can a &#039;lifelong member&#039; of this global banking and Big Oil corporate cabal make such an exposé? Well, Ferguson&#039;s membership of CFR does not constitute a conflict of interest as one might surmise. Instead, it illustrates his real motives; his film is not an exposé, it is a distraction.

The focus of Ferguson&#039;s 2007 piece, &#039;No End in Sight -- The American Occupation of Iraq&#039;, is the US government&#039;s post-invasion decision-making failures. Insufficient troop levels, looting in Baghdad, and corruption in the Iraqi government form the backbone of the film. Clearly, the film distracts audiences from what really matters: the decision to go to war in the first place, absent of evidence, and the relentless propaganda campaign from the media that aimed to legitimise the illegal war.

Let&#039;s take a look at some of Ferguson&#039;s other fellow CFR (corporate) members:

Boeing
DynCorp International
KBR
Raytheon Company
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Shell Oil Company
General Electric Company
JPMorgan Chase &amp; Company
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co.
Morgan Stanley
Rockefeller Group International, Inc.
The Blackstone Group L.P.
Rothschild North America, Inc.

Many of these companies have profited to the tune of trillions of dollars from the destruction and reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. Some even played integral parts in calling for the wars. Two of these corporations, DynCorp and KBR, are even in the &#039;top ten&#039; list of companies (http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/In­vesting/CompanyFocus/WhosProfit ingFromTheIraqWar.aspx?page=2) profiting from the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.

As with &#039;No End In Sight&#039;, &#039;Inside Job&#039; will not reveal the truth or bring the real culprits to light. Ferguson&#039;s agenda is clear; he is a mouthpiece for his corporate CFR bedfellows. This type of pseudo-exposé aims to distract audiences from the significant truths by focusing on secondary matters. The viewer will be led around by the nose like a blinkered horse, while Ferguson&#039;s war criminal pals can continue bombing and looting to their black hearts&#039; content. Inside Job? I couldn&#039;t think of a better name.

=====================

CFR&#039;s private membership includes neo-con warmongers such as: Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Vin Weber, John R. Bolton, General Colin L. Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Robert Zoellick, General David H. Petraeus, Robert M. Gates, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Timothy F. Geithner, Paul Volcker, and Henry M. Paulson Jr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vai tev neliekas mazliet savādi, ka Holivuda atmasko Volstrītu? Pats skatījos šo filmu pirms trim mēnešiem un te ir viens garš, bet, manuprāt, labs komentārs (daži interesanti fakti) par to:</p>
<p>Talking about &#8220;Inside Job&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>My curiosity was piqued when a friend told me of the upcoming Wall Street documentary exposé &#8216;Inside Job&#8217;. It&#8217;s got some pretty good reviews, and perhaps it will pack enough punch to educate the general public about the theft of taxpayer money that constituted the euphemistically termed &#8216;bailout&#8217;. Online reviews have praised the film, &#8220;A wake-up call of macroeconomic proportions&#8221;, &#8220;Economics explained beautifully&#8221; &#8212; certainly sounds worth a watch.</p>
<p>Admittedly though, you have to be quite naive to think that a genuine expose of Wall Street could even see the light of day in Hollywood, considering the corporate nature of media ownership. After a short Internet search, things begin to fall into place.</p>
<p>&#8216;Inside Job&#8217; is directed by Charles H. Ferguson. His past works include a film called &#8216;No End in Sight &#8212; The American Occupation of Iraq&#8217; &#8212; a piece critical of the Bush administration&#8217;s management of the war in Iraq. So far, so good. Sort of.</p>
<p>The alarming thing about Ferguson is his lifelong membership of the Council on Foreign Relations. See CFR&#8217;s private membership roster (<a href="http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html?letter=F" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html?letter=F</a>) and Ferguson&#8217;s Wikipedia page (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H.­_Ferguson" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H.­_Ferguson</a>).</p>
<p>CFR is a think tank which, in a nutshell, exists to shape the US international agenda in favour of its corporate members. CFR&#8217;s corporate roster is here (<a href="http://www.cfr.org/about/corporate/rost­er.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfr.org/about/corporate/rost­er.html</a>), and it makes for some startling reading.</p>
<p>The founding member corporations of CFR are as follows:</p>
<p>Bank of America Merrill Lynch<br />
Chevron Corporation<br />
Exxon Mobil Corporation<br />
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.<br />
Hess Corporation<br />
McKinsey &amp; Company, Inc.<br />
The Nasdaq OMX Group</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ve added the emphases for obvious reasons).</p>
<p>How can a &#8216;lifelong member&#8217; of this global banking and Big Oil corporate cabal make such an exposé? Well, Ferguson&#8217;s membership of CFR does not constitute a conflict of interest as one might surmise. Instead, it illustrates his real motives; his film is not an exposé, it is a distraction.</p>
<p>The focus of Ferguson&#8217;s 2007 piece, &#8216;No End in Sight &#8212; The American Occupation of Iraq&#8217;, is the US government&#8217;s post-invasion decision-making failures. Insufficient troop levels, looting in Baghdad, and corruption in the Iraqi government form the backbone of the film. Clearly, the film distracts audiences from what really matters: the decision to go to war in the first place, absent of evidence, and the relentless propaganda campaign from the media that aimed to legitimise the illegal war.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at some of Ferguson&#8217;s other fellow CFR (corporate) members:</p>
<p>Boeing<br />
DynCorp International<br />
KBR<br />
Raytheon Company<br />
Lockheed Martin Corporation<br />
Shell Oil Company<br />
General Electric Company<br />
JPMorgan Chase &amp; Company<br />
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co.<br />
Morgan Stanley<br />
Rockefeller Group International, Inc.<br />
The Blackstone Group L.P.<br />
Rothschild North America, Inc.</p>
<p>Many of these companies have profited to the tune of trillions of dollars from the destruction and reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. Some even played integral parts in calling for the wars. Two of these corporations, DynCorp and KBR, are even in the &#8216;top ten&#8217; list of companies (<a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/In­vesting/CompanyFocus/WhosProfit" rel="nofollow">http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/In­vesting/CompanyFocus/WhosProfit</a> ingFromTheIraqWar.aspx?page=2) profiting from the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.</p>
<p>As with &#8216;No End In Sight&#8217;, &#8216;Inside Job&#8217; will not reveal the truth or bring the real culprits to light. Ferguson&#8217;s agenda is clear; he is a mouthpiece for his corporate CFR bedfellows. This type of pseudo-exposé aims to distract audiences from the significant truths by focusing on secondary matters. The viewer will be led around by the nose like a blinkered horse, while Ferguson&#8217;s war criminal pals can continue bombing and looting to their black hearts&#8217; content. Inside Job? I couldn&#8217;t think of a better name.</p>
<p>=====================</p>
<p>CFR&#8217;s private membership includes neo-con warmongers such as: Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Vin Weber, John R. Bolton, General Colin L. Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Robert Zoellick, General David H. Petraeus, Robert M. Gates, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Timothy F. Geithner, Paul Volcker, and Henry M. Paulson Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on danbooru.py by nyucat</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/danbooru/comment-page-1/#comment-5786</link>
		<dc:creator>nyucat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>That is terrific !

Thanks so much for your work =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is terrific !</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your work =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WikiRebels dokumentālā filma by RM</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2010/12/wikirebels-dokumentala-filma/comment-page-1/#comment-5732</link>
		<dc:creator>RM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=718#comment-5732</guid>
		<description>Filma diezgan saistoša, bet nez vai to var saukt par sabalansētu un neitrālu, piem. 90% intervēto ir paši WikiLeaks dalībnieki un vienīgie pretējie viedokļi izskan no US valdības pārstāvju puses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filma diezgan saistoša, bet nez vai to var saukt par sabalansētu un neitrālu, piem. 90% intervēto ir paši WikiLeaks dalībnieki un vienīgie pretējie viedokļi izskan no US valdības pārstāvju puses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saprāta deficīts by Armands Leimanis</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2010/12/saprata-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-5722</link>
		<dc:creator>Armands Leimanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=708#comment-5722</guid>
		<description>Labs raksts, pievienojos tam par flattr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labs raksts, pievienojos tam par flattr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saprāta deficīts by cyxob</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2010/12/saprata-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-5720</link>
		<dc:creator>cyxob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=708#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>prātīgs raksts. sliecos piekrist tavam viedoklim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prātīgs raksts. sliecos piekrist tavam viedoklim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saprāta deficīts by Miks</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2010/12/saprata-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-5719</link>
		<dc:creator>Miks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=708#comment-5719</guid>
		<description>Paldies, par rakstu. 

P.S.

Vēlējos ieteikt http://flattr.com, iespējams tā būtu laba doma, jo būtu vismaz daži, kas šo servisu lieto un ir gatavi dot + par labiem rakstiem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paldies, par rakstu. </p>
<p>P.S.</p>
<p>Vēlējos ieteikt <a href="http://flattr.com" rel="nofollow">http://flattr.com</a>, iespējams tā būtu laba doma, jo būtu vismaz daži, kas šo servisu lieto un ir gatavi dot + par labiem rakstiem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Artim Pabrikam nepatīk WikiLeaks by Saprāta deficīts — untu.ms</title>
		<link>http://untu.ms/2010/12/artim-pabrikam-nepatik-wikileaks/comment-page-1/#comment-5718</link>
		<dc:creator>Saprāta deficīts — untu.ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untu.ms/?p=662#comment-5718</guid>
		<description>[...] brīvību pusē. Tā var būt arī neskaidra domāšana, jo, piemēram, iepriekš Pabriks runāja par diplomātisko saraksti nevis kā par diplomātu oficiālo pienākumu daļu, bet kā par kaut [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brīvību pusē. Tā var būt arī neskaidra domāšana, jo, piemēram, iepriekš Pabriks runāja par diplomātisko saraksti nevis kā par diplomātu oficiālo pienākumu daļu, bet kā par kaut [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

